Fethullahcilar Education and the Future of Central Asia

by Asher Kohn on 10/26/2009 · 9 comments

The Fethullahcilar education movement has become the target of think-tank consternation and governmental distrust (re: Islam Karimov) mostly for being difficult to pin down. Nurculuk is a far cry from Salafi Islam, as it is Islamicist and futurist at the same time. It has its roots in Sufism, which otherwise sober-faced experts are deeming Happy Fun Time Islam, but also works hard to call its brotherhood cemaat instead of tarikat (just don’t tell Soner Cagaptay, Amurrica’s Favorite Turk).

Of course, there is the Islamist issue. And as long as the Fethullahcilar teachers are Turkish urban males who live Islamic values, the schools are going to be seen as simply Medresses in slacks by a lot of people. And I of course don’t mean this article as a Fethullahcilar apologetic, I realize that there are lots of issues of proselytizing going on, and that not all teachers are as Fethullahci as Fethullah may like…and that these are serious issues. But they are also ones of corporate oversight, good policing, and other issues that can be reached through other mediums. The AKP’s new vision for Turkey, and its relationship with Fethullah Gulen, could be construed as troubling, and it certainly is fascinating, but it’s also something to be dealt with later.

At the same time, the Sufi brotherhood ideals that Ibn Battuta relied upon can have tremendous power in the days of the internet. Fethullahcilar schools are not just top-notch schools providing relatively good educations, they also have become networking hubs, sending students to different schools across the world, and teaching Istanbul Turkish as a lingua franca. Social networking allows for people to keep their ears to the ground and for news to travel quick, obviously, but it can also slip by most any governmental censorship. Well-educated, well-connected Kazakhs, Turkmen, Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Pakistanis, et. al. are good for most everyone, no?

So what can Fethullahcilar education do for Central Asia? It could, over time, help create the middle class that can transform these resource-rich countries into real, live, solid, states. A large part of the reason why there are fake democracies are because the leaders of the countries don’t trust the public with real democracy. But a power shift (which could conceivably become a power struggle) to a younger generation would allow a new guard, educated and connected through an entirely different paradigm, to take over leadership positions. Don’t forget, these schools have only been around since the mid-1990’s. When I was studying Turkish in Turkey, the vast majority of my class consisted of Central Asians studying on scholarship; loads of kids from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan, mostly (and one who was very adamant that he was from Cechnya, not Russia, or even the Kavkaz, but that’s another story). They all retained a very strong sense of “homeland” (I’m not sure how else to translate vatanlik) and were more interested in working in their home countries than Turkey once they graduated. The Fethullahcilar education system is, in short, building a new generation of Central Asian leaders who have a sense of pride in their homeland while being connected abroad, through Islamist and Turkic principles.

No, the folks who go to Fethullahcilar schools will not turn out like good Groton or Exeter men. And yes, the whole movement is something that sounds like it came out of Enver Pasha’s fever dreams, what with the Pax Turania and Islamic brotherhood. All the same, the rise of the movement intimates a rise of Turkic geopolitics as compared to all of the other interests in Central Asia. Michael noted the big partnership Kazakhstan did with Turkey pretty recently, for example, even if it is buried among the French and the Chinese and everyone else trying to get some oil. It’s an interesting long-term development that’ll have an impact on most everything in the region. And this is all without even mentioning their news branch, Zaman, throwing its weight around online and in print in Central Asia (and the Balkans, and Europe…)

This basically represents another competing identity for Central Asians, just proving the point that much more that there is more to the region then a “Western-oriented” or “Islamofascist” dichotomy (which, if you’re reading this blog, you probably already know). But it would be interesting to see if it actually works. Education is the basis of a cultural identity, “The school will finish what the bayonet began” and all of that. And education based around creating a well-traveled and well-spoken middle class seems to be a possible quiet revolution in Central Asia…the first grads ought to be getting jobs now, I’ll be on the lookout for any social sea change in Turkmenistan relative to Uzbekistan, personally. The more forms of identity that don’t involve blind chauvanism and dogmatic polemics, the better off the region is. Let’s see if this one takes root at all.

{ 9 comments }

1 Transitionland 10/26/2009 at 3:23 pm

“The more forms of identity that don’t involve blind chauvanism and dogmatic polemics, the better off the region is. Let’s see if this one takes root at all.”

Exactly. The expansion of Fethullahcilar education in Central Asia (and, to a lesser extent, the Balkans) is definitely something to watch with an open mind.

2 Laurence Jarvik 10/26/2009 at 4:16 pm

Or perhaps with a critical gaze?

Obviously, one source of appeal of the USSR in Central Asia was that it took the veil off women, and let Central Asia enter the modern world through Communism…which is why that episode it makes up 1/3 of Dziga Vertov’s propaganda film: “Three Songs of Lenin.” Believe it or not, there are people living in Central Asia who don’t want to live under Islamism. Not to mention that I don’t think Russia or China would ever permit it. A policy doomed to failure is by definition a mistake (as was Enver Pasha’s doomed crusade).

According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fethullah_Gülen): “In 1998 Gülen emigrated to the United States, ostensibly for health problems (he suffers from diabetes) but arguably in anticipation of being tried over remarks which seemed to favor an Islamic state.[15]” If even the Turkish government found his teachings too extreme, why should Americans to support him?

3 Turgai Sangar 10/31/2009 at 8:32 am

Hasn’t the obsession with ‘Islamism’ among some, more to do with the fact that they can not face the bankrupcy and failure of the ideological currents that they champion?

4 Sevket Zaimoglu 10/27/2009 at 2:11 pm

“Let’s see if this one takes root at all.”

Well, it has already taken root, if you remember that these schools began to be opened in the ex-Soviet Union Turkish republics from 1991 onwards. In 1998, I traveled throughout the region. At the Bishkek bus station, I was greeted by a young fellow named Cholpon Ata, who was a graduate of these schools, and who spoke Anatolian Turkish fluently. There are many more graduates like him who have started playing an important role in their countries.

5 Toryalay Shirzay 10/28/2009 at 12:12 am

LET’S remember that Turkey played a major role in spreading the islamic virus around the world and for many reasons ,Turkey seems to be playing this again and this must be of great concern to freedom loving persons.The revival and spread of islamism under any guise as in Fethullahcilar is an omen the central Asians and others cannot afford to ignore or take it lightly.

6 Al Sunna 10/29/2009 at 9:44 am

Assalam walakum,

This blog is a very nice blog, I have found it very beneficial to know more about islam. Thanks for sharing the information.

7 Ahad_Abdurahmon 10/31/2009 at 8:59 pm

Toryalay Shirzay,
I have nothing to do with Fethullahcilar and other groups who politicize Islam, but I think you MUST be careful with your word choice when talking about a religion in which billions of people have faith in!!!
Democracy was flexible enough to accommodate lutheran, protestant, catholic, etc types of christianity, mormonism, judaism including the most extreme variations of it, buddhism in east asia.
Most of these religions were and some them still are in serious ideological conflict with the concept of democracy. Orthodox jewish prohibit even today watching tv, amish people refuse using electronics at all, mormons are allow to marry many women, nevertheless, they are not preventing democracy to accommodate them.
Why shouldn’t we believe that it can accommodate people who have faith in Islam?
What we have today: wahhabism, taliban, al qaeda, etc are not ISLAM!!! They are political movements shaped, funded, and nurtured by the British and American secrete services at different times in history!!! They only use Islam as a source of legitimacy and penetration! They are monsters turned against their masters! British invented and nurtured wahhabism against the Ottomans, Americans invented and nurtured al qaeda and taliban against the Soviets!

8 Toryalay Shirzay 10/31/2009 at 11:23 pm

@Ahad, nonsense! you are seriously misinformed.

9 Ahad_Abdurahmon 11/1/2009 at 10:24 am

Even if I am misinformed, it does not mean that you can equate a religion of billions to a virus, jerk.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: