FOB MORALES-FRAZIER, AFGHANISTAN — It is interesting to hear what Kabulis think of the way their country is going. Here in Kapisa, just north and east (but a universe apart), things are rather different. Indeed, a common complaint locals raise when we suggest bad security might be why we can’t start many projects is, “oh c’mon — the Taliban are everywhere. That’s no excuse.”
Such a blasé attitude toward the prospect of random death is not easy to understand… at least from our vantage point. Indeed, I will venture a guess that a lot of the tragedy in what David is reporting is that the same choices and environment now facing Kabulis is really what far too many regular Afghans face on a regular basis. From my perspective, behind the concertina wire and hesco barricades, the contrast between mostly Pashtun and mostly Tajik areas cannot be any more stark: Nijrab Valley is glorious, lush, prosperous, and filled with well-maintained buildings. Afghaniya and Tagab Valleys have more obvious problems—there, the fields are browner, there is a noticeable lack of relative development, and driving through the people express far more fear of us.
There is a lesson in there. And it’s not that this is largely a Pashtun war, even if that may be true.
It bears repeating, no matter how monotonous it gets: Afghans are not Taliban. Even when they side with the Taliban, my sense is they do so because they marginally benefit from that alliance, not because they love watching their daughters be brutalized and their sons turned into human bombs. This is the insidious danger of unthinking men like Ralph Peters: by dehumanizing a fundamentally human problem, you leave yourself with no option aside from mass death; by viewing these decisions as rational, even predictable human behavior, a vastly larger, more humane, and ultimately more effective means of turning the war is made available.
The challenge is that most Americans, when they come to Afghanistan to report on it or to do research for their think tank, rarely leave Kabul. Hell, a depressing number don’t even leave Camp Eggers, where the COIN academy is located, and that is even more insulated from Kabul than Kabul is from the rest of Afghanistan. But the attitude change in place, as the reality of the countryside war slowly filters its way down Chicken Street, will certainly be interesting to see. Even during the Soviet War, Kabul was something of a refuge; it is no longer.
Out here in the bush, relatively speaking, things are different. A depressing number of people seem to have accepted that they just might die a random, meaningless death; but far from letting this thought overpower their emotions and coping skills, it seems to have focused their attentions onto the most immediate concerns: will we eat tomorrow, can I increase my stature within the community, will my son get married and have enough children, and so on. One of my new friends here laments that attitude, complaining that the adults, especially the spinghiri, or “white beards,” are unbelievably selfish because they only care about money and power. I hope it’s not condescending to disagree, and see that thought process as a rational response to severe deprivation.
That belief in fundamental rationality—that in fact people here really do make rational choices, even if we don’t understand all the factors that go into them—is one of the critical missing pieces from the war effort. I’ve met far too many soldiers—American, French, Infantry, PRT—who view the Afghans we encounter as quasi-human… or even (dare I say it) alien. They are not alien in the slightest. They are just a tiny bit different. But that basic core of humanity, the part that lets me sit down with a man I’ve never met and laugh about my unmarried beard, that core is what will win us the fight. If we want to.
Alas, I’m becoming more and more convinced that the big cultural battle is not in Afghanistan, but in the Army itself. Army guys love to talk counterinsurgency (it’s trendy!), but a depressing number couldn’t begin to tell you what it is or what it would look like. Instead you see the same old missions—cordon and searches, door-kicking, HVT strikes—being shoved into a COIN framework. The result is a mess, with no one understanding their ultimate mission. That issue, I feel, is the bigger mountain to move, than the ones greeting us outside the MRAP windows.
{ 5 comments }
Watch your six Josh. I wish I was there with you – truly I do. I understand your point about Afghans not being Taliban.
But …
I think you need to draw the argument a little tighter. If Taliban is set ‘A’ and Afghans is set ‘B’, just because one is a part of set A doesn’t make him part of set B. A does not equal B.
But these sets intersect, and SOME Afghans clearly are Taliban, some 25,000+ of them. Some people are members of both sets A and B.
As for Ralph Peters, I think you need to elaborate. I have never heard him say anything about killing everyone. This might be a pretty unfair representation of his views.
At any rate, stay safe, and keep us informed.
Best, HPS
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 02/06/2009 News and Personal dispatches from the front and the home front.
There is a serious tension in your argument. In the abstract, I agree with your (seemingly non-controversial claim) that Afghans, like all humans, are rational actors in that they seek to maximize their preferences/life chances.
[As an aside- Indeed, don't humans everywhere engage themselves in the struggle over "money and power" that your friend laments in Kapisa rather than invest in community/public goods? Quite simply this is the collective action problem. It exists everywhere from Nepalese micro-communities to New York City. It is why taxation is not voluntary. I would argue that because the organizations (including States, NGOS and others) involved in development and reconstruction projects (around the world, not just in Afghanistan) neglect this fundamental reality, institutions are established with perverse incentives which inevitably lead to undesirable (or less desirable) outcomes. Anyway...]
Yet, as Herschel Smith observes above, your dichotomy between Taliban/Afghan is far too categorical. And the logic of your argument seems to suggest that unlike the Afghans, the Taliban and those that fundamentally support (as opposed to tolerate) them are irrational actors. Is this really what you mean?
Also, for us to trust the reliability of your assessment (as opposed to the assessment of those sheltered journalists and think tank thinkers) of the life-goals of the average person in Kapisa, we need to know a great deal more about who (not names- but positions) you are talking to, where, with whom present, in what language, for how long you’ve known them, how many people you have talked to… etc.
Herschel, your point is well taken. I don’t mean to imply the Taliban is a phantom threat, but rather to offer a perspective against the “all Afghans are Taliban and hate us” meme that is starting to percolate around the blogosphere and op-ed columns.
Which brings me to Brent’s comment. He is mostly right. My exposure to people here is very circumscribed, in part because I can’t convince any units to either go outside the wire or let me tag along with them. I have done nothing close to a rigorous survey of opinions and attitudes — I am limited to talking with the people who feel comfortable talking to a group of American soldiers. The really bad ones, the ones who are more likely to pick up a weapon for something other than money, don’t usually show up to schmooze with the android-looking MRAP passengers.
So this isn’t an assessment, it is just an observation about a teeny tiny corner of the country. But it is also a corner that has become wracked with insecurity over the last two years. That this still hasn’t translated into obvious hostility (at least on a broad scale) strikes me as important.
Talk about your postcards from the edge. Even your limited access is worlds closer to the truth of the situation than ours possibly could be, so I’m riveted. Please watch your back and continue to use your intellectual charm to meet new people so that we can benefit from their insight. And greetings from New York.
Comments on this entry are closed.