Site menu:

Recent Comments

Follow on Twitter

twitter-bird.gif

RSS Updates on Twitter

RSS neweurasia

Links:

Tags

Academia Afghanistan air strikes aitmatov Andijon Announcements Aral Armenia Azerbaijan Balkhash Belarus blogosphere Bolashak Books Borat Business Cartoons Caspian Caucasus Central Asia central asia china east turkestan Central Asian Union China CIS Corruption Cotton Counternarcotics CSTO Culture Democracy Diplomacy draft East Turkestan Economics Education Elections Energy Environment EU Europe Events FOBistan Food Crisis Football Fundamentals Gas Geography Georgia Germany great game History Human Rights Humanities India Internet Iran Islam Islamism Japan Journalism Karimov Kaz Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Language Law Maps Media Military Affairs Mongolia Movies Music nationalism NATO Nazarbayev NGO North Caucasus North Turkestan obituary Oil Organizations OSCE Pakistan Peace Corps Pictures Policy Politics Propagandists Recipes Religion Reviews Roundup Russia Saakashvili SCO Site Announcements Skylarkings Society South Asia Sports Tajikistan Tamerlane Tatarstan TEFL The Great Game The War Travel Tulip Revolution Turkestan Turkey Turkmenbashi Turkmenistan Ukraine Untagged Uranium US USSR Uzbek Music Uzbekistan Video Water Management Wikipedia Women

Meta

Site search




blog advertising





Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?


Add to Google





An Official Buildup, Hopefully with a Purpose

So, it’s official: “well north of” 20,000 new troops for Afghanistan by 2010 or so. Four combat brigades and an aviation brigade will bring more troops for securing the tenuous holds we have there, and even allow for the provision of air power (with luck, along Route 1 from Ghazni through Zabul—a route so easy to secure from the air the Soviets never lost control of it during the 1980s).

Even better news is, most of the troops are set to go to the East, an incredibly violent yet ignored region in the country (the vast majority of media attention focuses on the south). Of course, the “Surge” rhetoric still applies, so there is no way to tell if there will be any coordination, any “surge” in the embedded trainers (who are incredibly effective), or any concerted effort to mesh western forces and ANSF.

One last hope: maybe now incoming brigades can be ordered to go out on patrol and execute COIN methods, instead of the current situation where they get to choose whether or not to.

Stumble it! |

Comments

Comment from Blazingsuth
Time: 11/22/2008, 8:24 pm

I was under the impression that the East was very much the focal point of operations in 2004 and 2005. I’m not sure if that’s just what I was focused on at that time, or if Coalition Forces in general were focused in that direction as well. What did reports from that time period look like?

|