Employment opportunity?
I’ve heard some news. That makes it hearsay for you, gentle reader, but it’s still interesting.
Kazakhstan has decided to spend some money on serious English education. A friend just leaving the Peace Corps in Kazakhstan has signed on for a promised $2000/month, plus reimbursed travel. That might not cut it in super cosmopolitan Astana or Almaty, but in Shymkent it’s enough to live very comfortably. Shortly after hearing this, I received an email and a phone call from two other former Peace Corps comrades that they had heard the salary might well be pushed to $5000/month. I imagine that would be the minimum amount Kazakhstan could offer to actually start convincing John Q. Englishteacher in Yonkers, New York to pick up stakes and move to the steppe for a year. And if Kazakhstan has the money, why not?
It brings to mind the amount of money that Saudi Arabia spends on educating its youth abroad. When I first talked about with friends studying through the Saudi Cultural Mission, I thought that Saudi Arabia was being enormously generous with money that might be better spent on infrastructure or other pressing needs at home. According to my friends, though, the Saudi Cultural Mission is an arm of the government required by certain financial restrictions. They explained that much of the money spent on Saudi oil comes from banks in Europe and the United States, money controlled by Western companies, and they require that a percentage of it actually stay in-country. Meaning, we’ll trade you goods and services [education and TVs] for your oil. I had no idea such arrangements could be made, but I can certainly see the wisdom of them.
Would I move back to Kazakhstan to make $5000 a month? Oh, definitely. I’m busy at the moment with graduate school and an assistantship, but if this offer stands in two years time and it’s shown to be reliable, I’m all for it. My only worry is that the money will be managed like the Bolashak Scholarship program in Kazakhstan, their analog to the Saudi Cultural Mission. I have friends whose payments have come weeks or months late. The amounts have also decreased, instead of rising with inflation.
I couldn’t find anything after a couple google searches, but I’m not sure if there is that much organization in the Kazakh Ministry of Education yet to start selling this idea abroad. According to my friend that’s already been hired, he actually went into the Ministry for his interview, which won’t work if they’re hiring internationally. In any event, I found this advertisement through the British Councils. I should point out that even if you totally lack ESL teaching experience, any native speaker of English with the patience to sit in a classroom for 25 hours a week would probably find a job with the right resume and references. Peace Corps Volunteers from Central Asia would be a shoe-in, I bet, whether or not they were in the educational field.
And if you’re bat-shit crazy and want to actually pay someone to teach in Kazakhstan, there’s this missionary organization you can sign up for. After $6ooo+, they’ll send you off. Of course, you don’t have to choose Kazakhstan. And I’m sure most of those sent off had their expenses paid by local churches and other philanthropic organizations. Still, my point is that when the government is so desperate for teachers, why would you actually pay someone for the right to teach there? At the very least, just Volunteer and go for free.
Tags: Peace Corps, Kazakhstan, TEFL, Bolashak.
Posted by Michael Hancock on June 14th, 2008
Permalink | Trackback | Comments: 4
Comments
Comment from Michael Hancock
Time: 6/15/2008, 10:31 am
TEFL Certification is confusing to me. I was able to walk into a full-time TEFL position when I got back in the states with the Peace Corps on my resume, and while I was there, we hired another teacher whose chief experience was being fluent in two languages. Again, this was a successful, major ESL institute near the University of Michigan. Perhaps you need it to teach abroad, and yet I seem to recall NOVA and JET, the English-teaching programs in Japan, didn’t seem to ‘require’ it, although I’m sure it makes things go more smoothly.
As for Missionary work, I’m against it on principle, but that certainly doesn’t stop me from understanding why people do it. I don’t have any missionary friends, but it’s not because I think they are evil. Just lack of opportunity, and the ones I met in Kazakhstan had been warned against the Peace Corps. Which is only fair, since we were kind of warned against them.
In short, if you’d like, I can edit the post to cut out the ‘bat-shit crazy’ remark, because that is a rather unprofessional cheap shot. I was hoping it was more funny than offensive, but I certainly see the potential for offense there.
Comment from nach
Time: 6/15/2008, 5:04 pm
I’d rather you change “their” to its correct form. The bat-shit bit was funny.
Comment from Michael Hancock
Time: 6/15/2008, 5:20 pm
Good eye! The blogosphere is chronically short of editors.





Time: 6/15/2008, 10:15 am
The main differences between Teachoeverseas.org and Peacecorps (besides the ultimate ideological ones) are one: that you are always sent with at least one teamate and two: you actually get TEFL certified before you leave. Most of the money you pay (or raise) that doesn’t go for airfare, pays for the training.