Site menu:

Recent Comments

Follow on Twitter

twitter-bird.gif

RSS Updates on Twitter

RSS neweurasia

Links:

Tags

Academia Afghanistan air strikes aitmatov Andijon Announcements Aral Armenia Azerbaijan Balkhash Belarus blogosphere Bolashak Books Borat Business Cartoons Caspian Caucasus Central Asia central asia china east turkestan Central Asian Union China CIS Corruption Cotton Counternarcotics CSTO Culture Democracy Diplomacy draft East Turkestan Economics Education Elections Energy Environment EU Europe Events FOBistan Food Crisis Football Fundamentals Gas Geography Georgia Germany great game History Human Rights Humanities India Internet Iran Islam Islamism Japan Journalism Karimov Kaz Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Language Law Maps Media Military Affairs Mongolia Movies Music nationalism NATO Nazarbayev NGO North Caucasus North Turkestan obituary Oil Organizations OSCE Pakistan Peace Corps Pictures Policy Politics Propagandists Recipes Religion Reviews Roundup Russia Saakashvili SCO Site Announcements Skylarkings Society South Asia Sports Tajikistan Tamerlane Tatarstan TEFL The Great Game The War Travel Tulip Revolution Turkestan Turkey Turkmenbashi Turkmenistan Ukraine Untagged Uranium US USSR Uzbek Music Uzbekistan Video Water Management Wikipedia Women

Meta

Site search




blog advertising





Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?


Add to Google





Missed Opportunities

The U.S. continues to have an airbase in Kyrgyzstan, although there is growing public pressure for its removal—some of this likely coming with instigation from various political elements in Russia. The Germans, meanwhile, were able to remain in Uzbekistan even after the U.S. was asked to leave and NATO forces have some limited basing facilities in Tajikistan as well.

However, the heyday of U.S. military influence in the region, and likely that of NATO as well, does seem to have passed for the foreseeable future.

It’s nice to see Martha Brill Olcott sharing our own views of how the U.S. has, to an extent, squandered opportunities in Central Asia. She of course said all of this in gentler, more neutral language, but the point remains: the U.S. has essentially given up on the “game” in the region.

This is something both Nathan and I have carped on at length, and there isn’t much more I could add to the discussion. But if the region is as strategically important as those who study it seem to believe, the ignorance and negligence with which the political leadership in Washington treat it is truly astounding—either we have gotten something dreadfully wrong, or they have. I don’t know which one is more depressing.

Stumble it! |
|