Registan.net

Forgive me for shamelessly ripping off Stephen Colbert. But there were two protests in America’s two wars recently that deserve comparing and contrasting.

The first was in Iraq, in which followers of Moqtada al-Sadr lined the streets of Najaf to peacefully call for an American withdrawal.

The second was in Kabul, in which a “group of Afghans” (we don’t know how large), rightfully angry over the beheading of a translator for foreign media outlets, calls for the summary execution of all captured Taliban.

So, one peaceful anti-American protest in a land now known for its marketplace chlorine bombs, and one angry mob calling for mass executions. Guess which protest the Instapundit found “more laudable?”

I rest my case.

Update: Carl Robichaud points to an Afghan Wire bonanza about a vigil and a boycott of news reporting by local media outlets in Kabul. They are and were right to hold vigils and condemn the brutal torture and beheading of Ajmal Naqshbandi; the rally, however, turned into a call for blood. The anger and urge for revenge is more than understandable (and, I feel I should note that I empathize much more with the motivations of the Afghans than the Sadrists). But Afghanistan has had enough revenge cycles. Naqshbandi, however, can best be honored by putting the captured Taliban on trial, going through the judicial process, and throwing them in prison—hopefully not for later exchange for the next hapless westerner to be abducted. In a way, he gave his life working for a better, more just Afghanistan. The best revenge for him is justice, not murder.

Stumble it!